America's Future · 80th Anniversary · Showcase
Post-Market Watch
A transparent risk-prioritization queue for food-chemical review. Each substance is scored on population exposure, hazard signal, and how thin the data is — and the queue ranks what deserves post-market review first.
Kyle Diamantas · Acting FDA Commissioner of Food & Drugs
Review priority = exposure × hazard × data-gap. Widely-eaten, higher-signal, thin-data substances rise. Weights are 1.0 each and shown openly — this is a prioritization, not a safety verdict.
Review queue — highest priority first
| # | Substance | Exposure | Hazard | Data gap | Priority | Why it ranks here |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PFAS (food-packaging migrant) | 5 | 9 | 8 | 360 | High prioritydominant driver: hazard signal |
| 2 | Synthetic dye (legacy color additive) | 8 | 7 | 6 | 336 | High prioritydominant driver: wide exposure |
| 3 | Emulsifier blend (processed foods) | 9 | 5 | 7 | 315 | High prioritydominant driver: wide exposure |
| 4 | Sweetener Y (high-intensity) | 9 | 4 | 5 | 180 | Medium prioritydominant driver: wide exposure |
| 5 | Preservative X (antimicrobial) | 6 | 6 | 4 | 144 | Lower prioritydominant driver: wide exposure |
| 6 | Flavor enhancer Z | 7 | 5 | 3 | 105 | Lower prioritydominant driver: wide exposure |
Adjust any factor (±) to see the queue re-rank live. Aggregate decision-support only — no individual is identified or surveilled.
prioritize.log
$ load feed --source "sample dataset (v1 — no live feed)"loaded 6 substances · formula = exposure × hazard × data-gap (weights 1·1·1)#01 360 [hazard signal] PFAS (food-packaging migrant)#02 336 [wide exposure] Synthetic dye (legacy color additive)#03 315 [wide exposure] Emulsifier blend (processed foods)#04 180 [wide exposure] Sweetener Y (high-intensity)#05 144 [wide exposure] Preservative X (antimicrobial)#06 105 [wide exposure] Flavor enhancer Zstatus: ranked · prioritization, not a safety verdict